Taking the fifth. Aug 16, 2009 14:03:53 GMT -5
Post by alanthony on Aug 16, 2009 14:03:53 GMT -5
That is a very good point ragan about Mary, and I was going to bring that fact to light. I read nowhere an explanation from Mary or Cami why the detective took the fifth.
At the point of the transcript where I am at.. The question is;..? Why did the Detective present a notebook with entries with dates and exact times as evidence of taking notes in this investagation, then claim they are mental notes when questioned on the validity.
Yes, ..my opinion on Mulder has never changed, that is again evident from questioning in the link provided by cami in this thread. Mulder could have exposed the dated entry, and times by just simply asking the Detective on the stand under oath who were you talking with on this day and that time from the book entered into evidence, and on this day who did you interview, OH what time was that again,… and the detective would have been finished from that point on, BUT Mulder let him off the hook…why? In two minutes of question that never took place would have discredited his witness as a complete joke…. That is not saying it was not a joke the testimony in the first place, I’m just saying it was not a complete joke.
I will get to my opinion on why the detective took the fifth a little later, but again. If Mary explained the fact somewhere, explain it again, and, again, and again, and again till the people of reality can actually see this explanation word for word on the forum somewhere!!!!!!, and on this thread. Or,… what.
In a final note Mary claims as validity to her opinion that she has read the transcript for over 10 years, m.. Memorizing some parts. If it takes a person one year to read the transcript, then review the transcript for over a ten year period as some kind of validity of superior intellect don’t be fooled by the desperate statement from this aging Hen.
Compounded knowledge; together under Mary statement.. Cami, and her have 20 years of knowledge in the debate on Routier, BUT I personally "alanthony" have over 150 years compounded knowledge. But, you do not hear me going around making that statement to sell an opinion. If I did I would say my 150 years supersedes both Mary and cami experience by 130 years.
If a personal speaker makes 12 appearances in one year, and another speaker makes 120 appearances in the same one year, do they have the same amount of compounded knowledge, and experience. The answer is no. In ten years the second person would have over 100 years of compounded experienced of knowledge on the same subject over the first speaker who has now ten years. They are not equal in the same topic, though they have both spent the same amount of time together researching, and presenting the same opinion based on over all.. years invested.
In a apprenticeship program the trainee is measured on hours entered, not the years entered accumulation the knowledge. It could take one person 3 years to accumulate the hours needed to make Journeyman, and the other apprentice 6 years depending on actual hours on the job. If someone tells you they got 10 years experience in a certain field… That usually means they are a useless tit.
In mean just on a simple level, both these ladies never present anything to facts being presented or questions asked, or discoveries mentioned, nothing. In Darin affidavit it makes no mention of an actual date he admitted to planning a crime, just the date on the affidavit when writen. That is two different, and compelling facts. One simply does not answer the other in the eyes of the truth says the blind man/women.