The For Darlie Routier Website Feb 27, 2010 10:39:13 GMT -5
Post by alanthony on Feb 27, 2010 10:39:13 GMT -5
I never said our system was perfect. And I certainly never said that people are NEVER wrongly accused and/or convicted. That is exactly why I do NOT support the death penalty and exactly why I believe that new DNA testing should be granted in cases where the testing was non-existent and the time of the crime or has much improved since the time of the crime.
No you said, “Do you honestly believe that the police do not check out a persons alibi.” and I said , 13 ( thirteen ) witnesses placed Dayes in the Legion the time of the crime in question. That is alibi witnesses. The victim in this crime said “ The police permanently altered her memory convincing her Dayes raped her.” Why would they do that, when there were alibi witnesses, not only that the actual person who committed the crime was a suspect with no alibi. It called profiling, and complemented with a jury plant, or in this case mentioned above, an all white jury of a Blackman’s peers.
The Routier investigation, and trial, it was physically impossible to prove the defended committed the crime, a special Jury was selected, and they found the defendant guilty on nothing that was presented in the original trial. It is called Jury planting. In all the case mentioned the lab produced evidence suggesting the defendant was guilty, and complemented with expert witness testimony. In Routier not one witness for the prosecution can provide written notes SUGGESTING.. Suggesting they altered their original opinion, BUT at the very least protecting them from perjury under the law. Who is the wiser when a jury of misfits are making the evaluation.