Invisible Intruder - The evidence Apr 12, 2009 19:04:01 GMT -5
Post by cami on Apr 12, 2009 19:04:01 GMT -5
The state of Texas and everyone involved in this investigation would look like the biggest laughing stocks in the world if in fact Routier was attack by a crazy animal. They never investigated this theory or ruled it out. They and everyone involved in this case want Routier executed not because she murdered her children, but because everyone reputations, and careers depend on Routier being executed or at the very least still guilty, but commented to life. That is what is most likely going to happen in this case, Unless they independently reinvestigate this case.
In closing Cami you want Routier to pay for this crime, because yourself is a victim of a similar crime. You believe if you lead the charge on the internet that Routier murdered her own children, and can get her executed you paid your dealt to your love ones that you lost.
That sad truth is Cami is Darlie Routier never committed this crime. I believe you believe Darin committed the crime, but you are willing to let an innocent woman pay for the crime based on the fact they can’t get the actual person responsible. I know you believe this. The same as I believe Darin, and Darlie had nothing to do with this crime. They are victims. It scary if someone can be convicted on this theory no one is safe from perverted justice. Anyone can be convicted on anything if everyone of trust conforms to agree, and the experts will validate the theory created.
If you and your lying friends ever open your eyes, you would see the corruption involved in this conviction. The state of Texas is not going to take the chance and execute this person, because it is possible after the fact the truth can still come out. The truth still exists. It may be through science or witness or evidence, but this is not a clear cut case, and everyone knows this fact. Including yourself, you know your lying to yourself every time you come on here, but you justified your opinion based on your own real life tragic events. That to me is perverted Christine.
I do not know if Routier will walk on this charge, but I do know they Texas will not execute her based on the fact doubt still exists.
Good Bye Christine.
Jurors have eyes and ears don't they? They are not professional, they are laymen just as you and I are. They can see the evidence with their own eyes and evaluate it as well. They can hold, feel, touch and do whatever with the evidence during deliberations. I think that I have the intelligence to evaluate evidence in a murder should I ever serve on a jury. I know the difference between transfer patterns, cast-off patterns, high-velocity blood spray, etc. Jurors are not idiots..well maybe OJ's jury was.
You don't understand what happens during a trial do you? Bevel was subjected to cross-examination from the defence attorney. If the defence could have impeached his testimony, they would have. LOL, Bevel is not losing any sleep over Darlie Routier and his testimony. He probably doesn't even remember her name.
No, I don't believe Darin is involved in these murders at all. Darlie committed the murders no one else. That's my logical opinion based on the physical evidence found at the crime scene. There's two pieces of irrefutable evidence, IMO, that place the bloody knife in Darlie's hands as the killer of her two boys.
I think you need some help Vinnie. I am sure they have some very good shrinks out west. I have never been a victim of a similar crime as the Routiers have. Why would you make that up? My only son and only child is quite alive and well thank you. Yes, I just lost my boyfriend in February but he died of natural causes, I didn't murder him.
I hate to burst your bubble but I am not a liar especially on this case. I have never been a victim of a violent crime in my life. My apt was robbed once years ago though if it makes you feel better, LOL.